AI Tools
AI is where autonomy gets lost fastest — and where the difference between control and dependence is one architectural decision. Every tool below can run without sending your data to someone else’s server.
Most AI tools exist in two modes: hosted (convenient, dependent) and self-hosted (requires effort, sovereign). TAS scores both. A low score is not a criticism — it is a measurement of what you trade for convenience.
Training a model costs millions. Companies need to recoup that investment — hosted APIs are how. That’s not a flaw, it’s economics. But you should know exactly what you’re paying: money, or control.
Unlike most software categories, AI gives you a real choice. The same model that runs behind a $20/month API can often run on your own hardware for free. TAS makes that difference visible.
Choose Your Level
3 levels of commitment · 15+ tool recommendations
The Two-Mode Problem
Almost every AI product exists in two configurations — and the TAS score changes dramatically between them:
| Tool | Self-hosted | Hosted |
|---|---|---|
| MiroThinker | A3/T2 (open weights, run locally) | A1/T1 (hosted app, account required) |
| ChatGPT | — | A0/T0 (cloud-only, proprietary) |
| Whisper | A3/T2 (run locally) | A0/T0 (OpenAI API) |
| Stable Diffusion | A3/T2 (ComfyUI local) | A0/T0 (cloud services) |
This is not a bug — it’s the core insight. The same intelligence, radically different autonomy.
Inference Engines
The runtime that loads and serves models on your hardware.
Chat Interfaces
Give your local models a usable frontend.
Reasoning & Research Models
Open-weight models designed for deep reasoning and agentic research.
Speech & Audio
Local speech-to-text and text-to-speech.
Image Generation
Local image generation and editing.
Hosted Services (for comparison)
These are the services that self-hosted AI replaces. Included for contrast — not as recommendations.
What’s Next
Set up local AI? Here’s where to go deeper: